Scott Pruitt once again proves that he is not competent to head an agency that bases its actions on science. Nor is he in any position to prove his outrageous claims, which can't be proven, because of the overwhelming evidence by scientists who know what they are doing. Pruitt does not.
Pruitt stated that he does "not agree that [CO2] is a primary contributor to the global warming that we see." So he admits there is global warming? But where is the basis for his "belief"? He choses to ignore what scientists have been tracking for over 100 years, with mountains of data to back their claims.
How do we impeach an EPA administrator?
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/09/519425866/epa-chief-scott-pruitt-questions-basic-facts-about-climate-change?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=npr&utm_medium=social&utm_term=nprnews
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/epa-chief-scott-pruitt-says-carbon-dioxide-not-primary-contributor-n731141
No comments:
Post a Comment