P. C. Doherty’s ninth novel in his Hugh Corbett mystery
series set in the early 1300’s England, involves the Knights of the Templar,
and takes place just a few years before they were destroyed by greedy
kings. Doherty hints at the changing
political climate in Europe as Philip IV in France and Edward I in England
become jealous of the Templars’ wealth, since both kingdoms are strapped for
cash. Satan’s Fire opens with Edward managing to convince the very
reluctant Templars to grant him a loan for his wars.
But strange events have occurred when the Knights of the
Templar have been in the vicinity, such as an attempt on Philip’s life while
hunting and ominous warnings pinned to doors.
The most bizarre of all are the reports of people killed in mysterious
fires that seem to ignite spontaneously and have a mind of their own.
Edward summons his chief clerk Hugh Corbett, who longs to
return to his manor in Leighton, to his wife and daughter. Edward has received a warning and is fearful
that someone is trying to assassinate him.
With extreme reluctance, Corbett plunges into the mystery of the strange
fires (hence the title) and what the Templars are doing in Framlingham, their residence in
England.
The Templars aren’t shown in a favorable light and remain
suspicious and aloof from Corbett and his manservant Ranulf and messenger
Maltote. But it becomes understandable when Doherty
shows the shifting perceptions and the movements against their order from all
sides. They feel their existence is
being threatened and have every right to believe so. There are certain splits
among the Knights, which are causing tension which do not help their cause.
Corbett is one of the luckiest men on the planet since he
manages to survive several attempts on his life in this book, but all the other
victims were offed in one chance. Hmm…
I like it when good ol’ chemistry is part of a novel, but not
so much when it is used to kill. Corbett
finally discovers an ancient recipe founded by the Greeks centuries before
after consulting old manuscripts.
On the downside once again, I read a book by Doherty and ask where is his
editor? Does he even have one? He
commits several infractions that I was taught to avoid during my writing: use
of passive voice, changes in point of view within one scene, etc. Was all of it unnceccsary?
No comments:
Post a Comment